View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001768 | 1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 | System Interfaces | public | 2023-07-18 23:56 | 2024-06-11 09:07 |
| Reporter | larryv | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | Editorial | Type | Omission |
| Status | Closed | Resolution | Accepted As Marked | ||
| Name | Lawrence Velázquez | ||||
| Organization | |||||
| User Reference | |||||
| Section | catgets | ||||
| Page Number | 648 | ||||
| Line Number | 22290 | ||||
| Interp Status | --- | ||||
| Final Accepted Text | See 0001768:0006394. | ||||
| Summary | 0001768: catgets: incomplete paragraph in "Change History" | ||||
| Description | Under section "Change History", subsection "Issue 7", the second paragraph ends mid-sentence. In its entirety, it reads:Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding | ||||
| Desired Action | At a bare minimum, on page 648, line 22290, change:Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, addingto: Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied.This is a complete sentence and paragraph, at least. Ideally, change: Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, addingto: Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding [whatever was added].Unfortunately, I don't know anything about this interpretation and thus cannot suggest replacement text. | ||||
| Tags | applied_after_i8d3, tc3-2008 | ||||
|
|
The text of Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 can be found here: https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/14539/AI-148.txt It doesn't contain any changes to catgets()! I wondered whether there might be a typo in the 148 number, but I have been unable to find any other interpretation (besides #044 that is already listed) affecting catgets(), and as far as I can see, all of the changes to catgets() between Issue 6 and Issue 7 are described in the other Change History entries. The other possibility is that this entry should have been on a different page, but all of the functions affected by #148 have a Change History entry for it. So I think all we can do at this point is treat this line as spurious and delete it. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | New Issue | |
| 2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Name | => Lawrence Velázquez |
| 2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Section | => catgets |
| 2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Page Number | => 648 |
| 2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Line Number | => 22290 |
| 2023-07-20 09:25 | geoffclare | Note Added: 0006394 | |
| 2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Interp Status | => --- |
| 2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Final Accepted Text | => See 0001768:0006394. |
| 2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Status | New => Resolved |
| 2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Resolution | Open => Accepted As Marked |
| 2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Tag Attached: tc3-2008 | |
| 2023-08-17 11:05 | geoffclare | Status | Resolved => Applied |
| 2023-08-17 11:06 | geoffclare | Tag Attached: applied_after_i8d3 | |
| 2024-06-11 09:07 | agadmin | Status | Applied => Closed |
