Anonymous | Login | 2025-02-11 19:28 UTC |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Type | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
0000100 | [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7] System Interfaces | Editorial | Omission | 2009-06-29 20:22 | 2021-10-14 15:48 | ||
Reporter | geoffclare | View Status | public | ||||
Assigned To | ajosey | ||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | Duplicate | ||||
Status | Closed | ||||||
Name | Geoff Clare | ||||||
Organization | The Open Group | ||||||
User Reference | |||||||
Section | dlsym | ||||||
Page Number | 735 | ||||||
Line Number | 24705 | ||||||
Interp Status | --- | ||||||
Final Accepted Text | |||||||
Summary | 0000100: dlsym return on success | ||||||
Description |
_____________________________________________________________________________ EDITORIAL Enhancement Request Number 30 gwc:xxxxxxxxxxxxx Defect in XSH dlsym (rdvk# 1) [gwc dlsym return on success] Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:43:51 +0100 _____________________________________________________________________________ The RETURN VALUE section on the dlsym() page does not state what the function returns on success, only on failure. |
||||||
Desired Action |
Insert "Upon successful completion, dlsym() shall return the address of the named symbol." before "If handle does not refer ..." |
||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
Attached Files | |||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
|
![]() |
|
(0000148) geoffclare (manager) 2009-07-02 15:48 |
In view of the recent discussion of XSH 2.12.3, I think that it would be a good idea to mention functions explicitly in the dlsym() RETURN VALUE section. I suggest that instead of inserting the text proposed in the Desired Action, we should instead insert: "Upon successful completion, if the named symbol refers to a function, dlsym() shall return the address of the function converted from type pointer to function to type pointer to void, otherwise dlsym() shall return the address of the named symbol." |
(0000209) Don Cragun (manager) 2009-08-27 17:04 |
The resolution proposed here has been incorporated in a larger set if changes to dlclose(), dlopen(), and dlsym() in 0000074. Therefore, this issue has been closed as a duplicate of that bug. |
Mantis 1.1.6[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |