View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0001062 | 1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 | Base Definitions and Headers | public | 2016-07-21 19:52 | 2024-06-11 08:52 |
Reporter | Steve Emmerson | Assigned To | ajosey | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | Editorial | Type | Error |
Status | Closed | Resolution | Accepted As Marked | ||
Name | Steve Emmerson | ||||
Organization | University Corporation for Atmospheric Research | ||||
User Reference | |||||
Section | 12.1 Utility Argument Syntax | ||||
Page Number | 215 | ||||
Line Number | 7073-7074 | ||||
Interp Status | --- | ||||
Final Accepted Text | See 0001062:0003819. | ||||
Summary | 0001062: Description of multiple synopsis lines is inconsistent with example | ||||
Description | The example needs a newline to separate the multiple synopsis lines. | ||||
Desired Action | Add a newline. | ||||
Tags | tc3-2008 |
|
The description does not say that there is an empty line between mutually exclusive synopsis forms, so I believe the example matches the stated requirements. But, in the XCU volume SYNOPSIS sections that have multiple synopsis forms to have an empty line between the various forms to further clarify the difference between different synopsis forms and synopsis forms that have continuation lines. I would suggest adding an empty line in the example on P215 between lines 7073 and 7074. |
|
I believe the problem Steve reported is an HTML translation issue. The HTML version has both example synopsis "lines" on the same line. Adding an empty line in the source would undoubtedly cure this, but it ought to be addressed in the forthcoming HTML translation of the 2016 edition rather than waiting until the next update to the source. |
|
To confirm this will be addressed in the html 2016 edition. |
|
P213, L7190-7191 (using 2016 edition page and line numbers):utility_name[−a][−b][−c option_argument] [−d|−e][−f[option_argument]][operand...] should be: utility_name [−a] [−b] [−c option_argument] [−d|−e] [−f[option_argument]] [operand...] and P215, L7269-7270 utility_name −d[−a][−c option_argument][operand...] utility_name[−a][−b][operand...] should be: utility_name −d [−a] [−c option_argument] [operand...] utility_name [−a] [−b] [operand...] Also add an empty line between the two SYNOPSIS forms of the nm utility on P3035, L100963 and 100964. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2016-07-21 19:52 | Steve Emmerson | New Issue | |
2016-07-21 19:52 | Steve Emmerson | Status | New => Under Review |
2016-07-21 19:52 | Steve Emmerson | Assigned To | => ajosey |
2016-07-21 19:52 | Steve Emmerson | Name | => Steve Emmerson |
2016-07-21 19:52 | Steve Emmerson | Organization | => University Corporation for Atmospheric Research |
2016-07-21 19:52 | Steve Emmerson | Section | => 12.1 Utility Argument Syntax |
2016-07-21 19:52 | Steve Emmerson | Page Number | => Item 8 |
2016-07-21 20:53 | Don Cragun | Page Number | Item 8 => 215 |
2016-07-21 20:53 | Don Cragun | Line Number | => 7073-7074 |
2016-07-21 20:53 | Don Cragun | Interp Status | => --- |
2016-07-21 20:53 | Don Cragun | Note Added: 0003304 | |
2016-07-21 21:50 | Don Cragun | Note Edited: 0003304 | |
2016-07-22 07:53 | geoffclare | Note Added: 0003305 | |
2016-08-26 14:38 | ajosey | Note Added: 0003365 | |
2017-08-24 15:33 | Don Cragun | Note Added: 0003819 | |
2017-08-24 15:34 | Don Cragun | Note Edited: 0003819 | |
2017-08-24 15:35 | Don Cragun | Note Edited: 0003819 | |
2017-08-24 15:36 | Don Cragun | Final Accepted Text | => See 0001062:0003819. |
2017-08-24 15:36 | Don Cragun | Status | Under Review => Resolved |
2017-08-24 15:36 | Don Cragun | Resolution | Open => Accepted As Marked |
2017-08-24 15:37 | Don Cragun | Tag Attached: tc3-2008 | |
2019-10-28 11:52 | geoffclare | Status | Resolved => Applied |
2024-06-11 08:52 | agadmin | Status | Applied => Closed |