View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000929 | 1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 | Shell and Utilities | public | 2015-03-10 10:14 | 2019-06-10 08:54 |
Reporter | geoffclare | Assigned To | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | Editorial | Type | Omission |
Status | Closed | Resolution | Accepted | ||
Name | Geoff Clare | ||||
Organization | The Open Group | ||||
User Reference | |||||
Section | diff | ||||
Page Number | 2628 | ||||
Line Number | 85331 | ||||
Interp Status | --- | ||||
Final Accepted Text | |||||
Summary | 0000929: Missing "2" in diff -U text about consecutive unaffected lines | ||||
Description | In an email thread from Feb 10, Vincent Lefevre reported that the text "If -U n is specified, the output shall contain no more than n consecutive unaffected lines" does not match existing practice, which is to output up to 2*n consecutive unaffected lines. Since the rationale states (line 85403) that the -u and -U options were adopted from GNU diff, it seems clear that this is simply an editorial omission of the digit "2". | ||||
Desired Action | Change: shall contain no more than n consecutive unaffected lines to: shall contain no more than 2n consecutive unaffected lines | ||||
Tags | tc2-2008 |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2015-03-10 10:14 | geoffclare | New Issue | |
2015-03-10 10:14 | geoffclare | Name | => Geoff Clare |
2015-03-10 10:14 | geoffclare | Organization | => The Open Group |
2015-03-10 10:14 | geoffclare | Section | => diff |
2015-03-10 10:14 | geoffclare | Page Number | => 2628 |
2015-03-10 10:14 | geoffclare | Line Number | => 85331 |
2015-03-10 10:14 | geoffclare | Interp Status | => --- |
2015-04-09 16:28 | rhansen | Status | New => Resolved |
2015-04-09 16:28 | rhansen | Resolution | Open => Accepted |
2015-04-09 16:28 | rhansen | Tag Attached: tc2-2008 | |
2019-06-10 08:54 | agadmin | Status | Resolved => Closed |