Anonymous | Login | 2023-06-11 01:13 UTC |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Type | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
0001723 | [Issue 8 drafts] Shell and Utilities | Editorial | Clarification Requested | 2023-05-07 15:15 | 2023-05-07 15:15 | |||||||
Reporter | rillig | View Status | public | |||||||||
Assigned To | ||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | Open | |||||||||
Status | New | Product Version | Draft 3 | |||||||||
Name | Roland Illig | |||||||||||
Organization | ||||||||||||
User Reference | ||||||||||||
Section | make | |||||||||||
Page Number | 3127 | |||||||||||
Line Number | 105509 | |||||||||||
Final Accepted Text | ||||||||||||
Summary | 0001723: Re-check whether POSIX make is still a subset of almost all implementations | |||||||||||
Description |
Line 105509 says: > Because the syntax specified for the make utility is, by and large, a subset of the syntaxes accepted by almost all versions of make, [...] If this statement still holds (even after defining immediate-expansion macros, the '::=' and ':::=' macro definition operators, the lazily updated include files, and probably more), mention these features to make the statement less convincing. If this statement doesn't hold anymore, reword it to reflect reality. |
|||||||||||
Desired Action | . | |||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||||||
|
There are no notes attached to this issue. |
Mantis 1.1.6[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |