Austin Group Defect Tracker

Aardvark Mark IV

Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs
  

Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
ID Category Severity Type Date Submitted Last Update
0001768 [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2] System Interfaces Editorial Omission 2023-07-18 23:56 2023-08-17 11:05
Reporter larryv View Status public  
Assigned To
Priority normal Resolution Accepted As Marked  
Status Applied  
Name Lawrence Velázquez
Organization
User Reference
Section catgets
Page Number 648
Line Number 22290
Interp Status ---
Final Accepted Text See Note: 0006394.
Summary 0001768: catgets: incomplete paragraph in "Change History"
Description Under section "Change History", subsection "Issue 7", the second paragraph ends mid-sentence. In its entirety, it reads:
Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding
Desired Action At a bare minimum, on page 648, line 22290, change:
Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding
to:
Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied.
This is a complete sentence and paragraph, at least.

Ideally, change:
Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding
to:
Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding [whatever was added].
Unfortunately, I don't know anything about this interpretation and thus cannot suggest replacement text.
Tags applied_after_i8d3, tc3-2008
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
(0006394)
geoffclare (manager)
2023-07-20 09:25

 The text of Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 can be found here:

https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/14539/AI-148.txt [^]

It doesn't contain any changes to catgets()!

I wondered whether there might be a typo in the 148 number, but I have been unable to find any other interpretation (besides #044 that is already listed) affecting catgets(), and as far as I can see, all of the changes to catgets() between Issue 6 and Issue 7 are described in the other Change History entries.

The other possibility is that this entry should have been on a different page, but all of the functions affected by #148 have a Change History entry for it.

So I think all we can do at this point is treat this line as spurious and delete it.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2023-07-18 23:56 larryv New Issue
2023-07-18 23:56 larryv Name => Lawrence Velázquez
2023-07-18 23:56 larryv Section => catgets
2023-07-18 23:56 larryv Page Number => 648
2023-07-18 23:56 larryv Line Number => 22290
2023-07-20 09:25 geoffclare Note Added: 0006394
2023-07-27 15:30 Don Cragun Interp Status => ---
2023-07-27 15:30 Don Cragun Final Accepted Text => See Note: 0006394.
2023-07-27 15:30 Don Cragun Status New => Resolved
2023-07-27 15:30 Don Cragun Resolution Open => Accepted As Marked
2023-07-27 15:30 Don Cragun Tag Attached: tc3-2008
2023-08-17 11:05 geoffclare Status Resolved => Applied
2023-08-17 11:06 geoffclare Tag Attached: applied_after_i8d3

Mantis 1.1.6[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker