View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001780 | 1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 | Rationale | public | 2023-10-17 02:34 | 2024-06-11 09:07 |
| Reporter | dannyniu | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | Editorial | Type | Clarification Requested |
| Status | Closed | Resolution | Accepted As Marked | ||
| Name | DannyNiu/NJF | ||||
| Organization | <individual> | ||||
| User Reference | c181.pdf | ||||
| Section | B.2.8 Realtime >> Message Passing | ||||
| Page Number | 3590 | ||||
| Line Number | 122093-122095 | ||||
| Interp Status | --- | ||||
| Final Accepted Text | 0001780:0006562 | ||||
| Summary | 0001780: The punctuation is confusing/ambiguous | ||||
| Description | Towards the end of the rationale for "Priotization of Messages", this is said: > The prioritization does add additional overhead to the message operations in those cases it is actually used but a clever implementation can optimize for the FIFO case to make that more efficient It is confusing when reading towards the middle: "... overhead to the message operations in those cases it is actually ..." I suspect a comma is missing between "operations" and "in those cases". | ||||
| Desired Action | Clarify this paragraph. | ||||
| Tags | applied_after_i8d3, tc3-2008 | ||||
|
|
This has been moved from Issue 8 drafts to 1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2. The c181.pdf, page, and line numbers all refer to Issue 7 with TC2. Note also that this text has not been changed in Issue8 draft 3. |
|
|
I would suggest that a comma instead be added after "but", but agree that the sentence needs one, simply because the clauses the conjunction is coordinating are both long. |
|
|
Re 0001780:0006544 If you actually intended to say "before 'but'" rather than after, I'd agree. |
|
|
I did; thanks, Robert. Nothing brings out solecisms like trying to fix solecisms. |
|
|
Change:The prioritization does add additional overhead to the message operations in those cases it is actually used but a clever implementation can optimize for the FIFO case to make that more efficient.to: The prioritization does add additional overhead to the message operations, in those cases it is actually used, but a clever implementation can optimize for the FIFO case to make that more efficient. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 02:34 | dannyniu | New Issue | |
| 2023-10-17 02:34 | dannyniu | Name | => DannyNiu/NJF |
| 2023-10-17 02:34 | dannyniu | Organization | => <individual> |
| 2023-10-17 02:34 | dannyniu | User Reference | => c181.pdf |
| 2023-10-17 02:34 | dannyniu | Section | => B.2.8 Realtime >> Message Passing |
| 2023-10-17 02:34 | dannyniu | Page Number | => 3590 |
| 2023-10-17 02:34 | dannyniu | Line Number | => 122093-122095 |
| 2023-10-17 04:47 | Don Cragun | Project | Issue 8 drafts => 1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 |
| 2023-10-17 04:52 | Don Cragun | Interp Status | => --- |
| 2023-10-17 04:52 | Don Cragun | Note Added: 0006540 | |
| 2023-10-17 04:54 | Don Cragun | Note Edited: 0006540 | |
| 2023-10-17 20:37 | gbrandenrobinson | Note Added: 0006544 | |
| 2023-10-17 23:11 | kre | Note Added: 0006545 | |
| 2023-10-17 23:22 | gbrandenrobinson | Note Added: 0006546 | |
| 2023-11-02 15:10 | geoffclare | Note Added: 0006562 | |
| 2023-11-02 15:12 | geoffclare | Final Accepted Text | => 0001780:0006562 |
| 2023-11-02 15:12 | geoffclare | Status | New => Resolved |
| 2023-11-02 15:12 | geoffclare | Resolution | Open => Accepted As Marked |
| 2023-11-02 15:13 | geoffclare | Tag Attached: tc3-2008 | |
| 2023-11-14 10:39 | geoffclare | Status | Resolved => Applied |
| 2023-11-14 10:40 | geoffclare | Tag Attached: applied_after_i8d3 | |
| 2024-06-11 09:07 | agadmin | Status | Applied => Closed |
