Anonymous | Login | 2024-04-20 05:45 UTC |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Type | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
0001095 | [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2] Shell and Utilities | Editorial | Error | 2016-10-20 02:01 | 2016-10-27 18:12 | ||
Reporter | Mark_Galeck | View Status | public | ||||
Assigned To | |||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | Withdrawn | ||||
Status | Closed | ||||||
Name | Mark Galeck | ||||||
Organization | |||||||
User Reference | |||||||
Section | 2.10.2 Shell Grammar Rules | ||||||
Page Number | 2376, 2380 | ||||||
Line Number | 75911-75914, 76129 | ||||||
Interp Status | --- | ||||||
Final Accepted Text | |||||||
Summary | 0001095: Shell Grammar rule 2 cannot be the only one to apply because it does not assign WORD | ||||||
Description |
I raised issue:1088 about that there are not explicitly multiple Shell Grammar rules to apply, to which kre explained in Note: 0003431 , that rule 1 always applies, but a higher numbered rule has precedence, if present. This does not work for filename production, where rule 2 is used. This rule does not say that TOKEN in question should be converted to WORD. Rule 1 does but since if rule 2 applies, rule 1 cannot be used. |
||||||
Desired Action |
Add to rule 2: "The token WORD shall be returned." I have to fill something here and this seems correct, but I am afraid to post it; I tried something like this in issue:1094 and kre roundly criticized me. |
||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
Attached Files | |||||||
|
Notes | |
(0003464) Mark_Galeck (reporter) 2016-10-27 12:44 |
This report is included in the summary report 1100 and can be cancelled. |
(0003476) Don Cragun (manager) 2016-10-27 18:12 |
Withdrawn by submitter in Note: 0003464 |
Mantis 1.1.6[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |