View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000666 | 1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 | Base Definitions and Headers | public | 2013-03-05 01:08 | 2019-06-10 08:55 |
Reporter | sar | Assigned To | ajosey | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | Comment | Type | Error |
Status | Closed | Resolution | Accepted As Marked | ||
Name | Steve Rago | ||||
Organization | NEC Laboratories America | ||||
User Reference | |||||
Section | limits.h | ||||
Page Number | 270-273 | ||||
Line Number | 8853-9004 | ||||
Interp Status | Approved | ||||
Final Accepted Text | See 0000666:0001493. | ||||
Summary | 0000666: RE_DUP_MAX is listed as both runtime invariant and runtime increasable | ||||
Description | RE_DUP_MAX is listed as both runtime invariant and runtime increasable. It should be in only one (runtime increasable). In addition, the descriptions differ. | ||||
Desired Action | Remove RE_DUP_MAX from the runtime invariant section and update the description in the runtime increasable section to use the improved wording from the description in the runtime invariant section. | ||||
Tags | tc2-2008 |
has duplicate | 0000775 | Closed | 1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 | RE_DUP_MAX specified twice in limits.h |
|
Interpretation response ------------------------ The standard is unclear on this issue, and no conformance distinction can be made between alternative implementations based on this. This is being referred to the sponsor. Rationale: ------------- None. Notes to the Editor (not part of this interpretation): ------------------------------------------------------- At page 270 line 8853-8856 delete: {RE_DUP_MAX} Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE or ERE interval expression; see Section 9.3.6 (on page 186) and Section 9.4.6 (on page 189). Minimum Acceptable Value: {_POSIX2_RE_DUP_MAX} At page 273 line 9002-9003 change: Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a regular expression permitted when using the interval notation \{m,n\}; see Chapter 9 (on page 181). to (copied from line 8854): Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE or ERE interval expression; see Section 9.3.6 (on page 186) and Section 9.4.6 (on page 189). At page 273 line 9004 change: {_POSIX2_RE_DUP_MAX} to: {_POSIX_RE_DUP_MAX} At page 275 line 9076-9077 change: The number of repeated occurrences of a BRE permitted by the regexec() and regcomp() functions when using the interval notation {\(m,n\}; see Section 9.3.6 (on page 186). to (copied from line 8854): Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE or ERE interval expression; see Section 9.3.6 (on page 186) and Section 9.4.6 (on page 189). At page 277 line 9174-9175 change: Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a regular expression permitted when using the interval notation \{m,n\}; see Chapter 9 (on page 181). to (copied from line 8854): Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE or ERE interval expression; see Section 9.3.6 (on page 186) and Section 9.4.6 (on page 189). Cross-volume changes to XCU... At page 2285 line 71853 section 1.2 change: {_POSIX2_RE_DUP_MAX} to: {_POSIX_RE_DUP_MAX} At page 2285 line 71853-71856 section 1.2 change: The maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE permitted when using the interval notation \{m,n\}; see XBD Section 9.3.6 (on page 186). to: Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE or ERE interval expression; see XBD Section 9.3.6 (on page 186) and XBD Section 9.4.6 (on page 189). At page 2287 line 71911-71916 section 1.2 change: The maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE permitted when using the interval notation \{m,n\}; see XBD Section 9.3.6 (on page 186). to: Maximum number of repeated occurrences of a BRE or ERE interval expression; see XBD Section 9.3.6 (on page 186) and XBD Section 9.4.6 (on page 189). At page 2287 line 71911 section 1.2 change: {_POSIX2_RE_DUP_MAX} to: {_POSIX_RE_DUP_MAX} |
|
If the change to P273, L9004 suggested in 0000666:0001493 is made, shouldn't changes also be made to P2285, L71853 and P2287, L71911? |
|
Well spotted, Don. The descriptions at those locations are also wrong. I've updated 0000666:0001493 to add the XCU changes. |
|
Interpretation Proposed 29 Mar 2013 |
|
Interpretation approved 3 May 2013 |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | New Issue | |
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | Status | New => Under Review |
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | Assigned To | => ajosey |
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | Name | => Steve Rago |
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | Organization | => NEC Laboratories America |
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | Section | => limits.h |
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | Page Number | => 270-273 |
2013-03-05 01:08 | sar | Line Number | => 8853-9004 |
2013-03-15 10:36 | geoffclare | Note Added: 0001493 | |
2013-03-15 12:46 | Don Cragun | Note Added: 0001494 | |
2013-03-15 12:46 | Don Cragun | Note Edited: 0001494 | |
2013-03-15 14:10 | geoffclare | Note Edited: 0001493 | |
2013-03-15 14:12 | geoffclare | Note Added: 0001495 | |
2013-03-21 15:12 | Don Cragun | Interp Status | => Pending |
2013-03-21 15:12 | Don Cragun | Final Accepted Text | => See 0000666:0001493. |
2013-03-21 15:12 | Don Cragun | Status | Under Review => Interpretation Required |
2013-03-21 15:12 | Don Cragun | Resolution | Open => Accepted As Marked |
2013-03-21 15:13 | Don Cragun | Tag Attached: tc2-2008 | |
2013-03-21 15:15 | geoffclare | Note Edited: 0001493 | |
2013-03-29 08:03 | ajosey | Interp Status | Pending => Proposed |
2013-03-29 08:03 | ajosey | Note Added: 0001510 | |
2013-05-03 12:21 | ajosey | Interp Status | Proposed => Approved |
2013-05-03 12:21 | ajosey | Note Added: 0001585 | |
2013-10-23 01:29 | Don Cragun | Relationship added | has duplicate 0000775 |
2019-06-10 08:55 | agadmin | Status | Interpretation Required => Closed |