Austin Group Defect Tracker

Aardvark Mark IV

Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs
  

Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
ID Category Severity Type Date Submitted Last Update
0000155 [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7] Shell and Utilities Objection Error 2009-09-22 11:24 2013-04-16 13:06
Reporter geoffclare View Status public  
Assigned To ajosey
Priority normal Resolution Accepted  
Status Closed  
Name Geoff Clare
Organization The Open Group
User Reference
Section 2.14 set
Page Number 2359
Line Number 74590
Interp Status Approved
Final Accepted Text Note: 0000290
Summary 0000155: set -u should require an error when $1 etc. are unset
Description A discussion on the austin-group-l mailing list in May 2009
identified a problem with the description of set -u. Since it
uses the word "variable" instead of "parameter", the shell is not
required to report an error if the positional parameters $1, $2,
etc. are used when unset. This does not match existing practice.

The question then arose of how to correct the problem, particularly
the detail of whether set -u should apply to $@ and $*. It was
felt that it should not apply to these, even though some shells do
currently report an error for them, since it is normal and common
for $@ and $* to be used in shell scripts regardless of whether they
were passed any arguments.
Desired Action Change:

    "The shell shall write a message to standard error when it tries
    to expand a variable that is not set and immediately exit."

to:

    "The shell shall write a message to standard error and immediately
    exit when it tries to expand an unset parameter other than the '@'
    and '*' special parameters."

Add to RATIONALE for set after line 74714:

    "Historically some shells applied the -u option to all parameters
    including $@ and $*. The standard developers felt that this was
    a misfeature since it is normal and common for $@ and $* to be
    used in shell scripts regardless of whether they were passed any
    arguments. Treating these uses as an error when no arguments are
    passed reduces the value of -u for its intended purpose of
    finding spelling mistakes in variable names and uses of unset
    positional parameters."
Tags tc1-2008
Attached Files

- Relationships
related to 0000457Closedajosey omitted word in parameter expansions 
related to 0000559Appliedajosey arithmetic expansion should honor 'set -u' 
related to 0000280Closedajosey description is not clear enought on what happens if the shell immediately exits 

-  Notes
(0000240)
msbrown (manager)
2009-09-24 15:57

 "The standard states
"The shell shall write a message to standard error when it tries
    to expand a variable that is not set and immediately exit."

and conforming implementations must conform to this. However, concerns have been raised about this which are being referred to the sponsor."
(0000290)
ajosey (manager)
2009-11-07 07:27
edited on: 2009-11-07 07:28

 Interpretation response
------------------------
The standard states "The shell shall write a message to standard error when it tries to expand a variable that is not set and immediately exit." and conforming implementations must conform to this. However, concerns have been raised about this which are being referred to the sponsor."

Rationale:
-------------
None.

Notes to the Editor (not part of this interpretation):
-------------------------------------------------------
Make the change suggested by the submitter

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare New Issue
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Status New => Under Review
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Assigned To => ajosey
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Name => Geoff Clare
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Organization => The Open Group
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Section => 2.14 set
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Page Number => 2359
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Line Number => 74590
2009-09-22 11:24 geoffclare Interp Status => ---
2009-09-24 15:57 msbrown Interp Status --- => Pending
2009-09-24 15:57 msbrown Note Added: 0000240
2009-09-24 15:57 msbrown Status Under Review => Interpretation Required
2009-09-24 15:57 msbrown Resolution Open => Accepted
2009-11-07 07:27 ajosey Note Added: 0000290
2009-11-07 07:28 ajosey Interp Status Pending => Proposed
2009-11-07 07:28 ajosey Final Accepted Text => Note: 0000290
2009-11-07 07:28 ajosey Note Edited: 0000290
2009-11-07 07:28 ajosey Note Edited: 0000290
2009-12-07 16:55 ajosey Interp Status Proposed => Approved
2010-09-21 11:19 geoffclare Tag Attached: tc1-2008
2011-06-03 18:24 eblake Relationship added related to 0000457
2012-04-26 17:18 eblake Relationship added related to 0000559
2012-05-11 08:08 geoffclare Relationship added related to 0000280
2013-04-16 13:06 ajosey Status Interpretation Required => Closed

Mantis 1.1.6[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker